Layer A only

Citizen Peeper — Legal Defense Fence

v2.2-astration · 2026-08-14 · Exhibit A extras

Walk in with cold weights. Never lead with a story. Export hard + testimony only. Pattern stays in the private archive.

Public titles and geographic adjacency may be stated as public facts. Motive language and unprovable orchestration claims stay out of filings.

244906225

Paternity / custody (PA track also noted as 244906225PA)

244906806PO

Protective order

20250632-CA

Appellate track noted in archive

Property / service

1816 S McClelland St, Salt Lake City, UT 84105

Service: 1967 S 800 E (as used in filings)

  • · Timothy Andrew Lewis — Plaintiff/Respondent, pro se
  • · Michaela / Mikayla Lewis (Hori) — Petitioner
  • · GAL Virginia Sudbury (current); prior Anthony Ferdon
  • · Minor children (documented): Oliver (eldest; turned 8 on 8 May 2026), Eden, Willa (~3 as of May 2026)

Operating rules

  1. Export only hard + testimony weights.
  2. One date, one actor, one action per paragraph.
  3. Never lead with Hypercodex, stego, bloodlines, or “the system.”
  4. Name public titles and addresses; do not invent motives.
  5. Child language is always about safety and relationship — never revenge.
  6. If a fact is only pattern, it stays in Master Archive Layer C.
  7. Copies off-device. Contemporaneous notes dated the day they happen.
  8. This fence is organization, not legal advice. Review with counsel before filing.

May 22 consult — public facts only

202-page consult transcript stays with counsel. Not a public download. No SSNs. Not an order.

  • · Third District parenting / paternity matter 244906225 (not the PO-violation criminal track).
  • · Judge named in the room: Mark / Marc Kouris (retired February 2026).
  • · Fee figure discussed: ~$30,000 opposing fees — same neighborhood as the ~$36,712 composite.
  • · Speaker states not-guilty on the PO-violation track; state attorney on that matter.
  • · Firm in the room: Nelson Jones. Spoken retainer $4,000.
  • · Speaker recorded the consult; later asked about a refund when the firm might not take a mid-stream case.

Priority walls

P1

ADA Accommodation Refusal · 9 January 2026

STRONGEST · needs-docs

Formal remote-appearance request for documented PTSD / severe anxiety / agoraphobia / executive dysfunction was not ruled on; breakdown on record; minutes say only “break.”

Fact spine

  • 2026-01-09 · Plaintiff (pro se)

    Requested ADA remote appearance for PTSD, severe anxiety, agoraphobia, executive dysfunction; warned of high risk of anxiety attack if forced to appear in person.

    Written/oral accommodation request in case file · Weight: hard

  • 2026-01-09 · Court

    Did not rule on accommodation; hearing proceeded; visible anxiety crisis requiring a break; minutes record only unexplained “break.”

    Hearing video + court minutes · Weight: hard

  • 2026-01-09+ · Plaintiff

    Post-hearing disability worsening; agoraphobia / housebound period (~2 months); continued unaddressed ADA needs.

    Medical notes / contemporaneous journal · Weight: testimony

Export draft

On or about January 9, 2026, Plaintiff formally requested a reasonable ADA accommodation (remote appearance via Zoom/WebEx) based on documented disabilities including PTSD, severe anxiety, agoraphobia, and executive dysfunction. The Court did not rule on the request. During the hearing Plaintiff experienced a visible anxiety crisis requiring a break. Court minutes record only an unexplained “break” and do not document the accommodation request or the episode. This denial of interactive process and failure to accommodate violated Title II principles and materially impaired Plaintiff’s ability to participate.

Attach

  • Written ADA request (if any)
  • Hearing video clip of breakdown
  • Minutes showing only “break”
  • Medical/therapy letters listing diagnoses (if available)
  • Later ADA motion package for future hearings

Never say

  • Any Hypercodex or surveillance theory
  • That the court is “part of a network”
  • Psychiatric labels you cannot source

Rebuttal: If opposed as “he still participated”: the breakdown itself is the evidence of impairment; the minutes’ silence is the evidence of process failure.

P2

Neighbor Conflict of Interest · AG Special Litigation + DHHS

STRONGEST · needs-docs

Next-door neighbor holds Utah AG Division Director title (Constitutional Defense & Special Litigation); spouse in DHHS/CPS orbit; ADU city pressure documentable.

Fact spine

  • ongoing · David N. Wolf (public title)

    Holds public AG title as Division Director, Constitutional Defense & Special Litigation; resides adjacent to 1816 S McClelland family property / ADU site.

    State directory + property records · Weight: hard

  • ongoing · Carrie Martinez-Wolf (public employment)

    Senior DHHS role with CPS oversight proximity (public employment fact).

    State employment / directory · Weight: hard

  • 2024+ · City / neighbor process

    Legally permitted ADU project opposed through city channels; document exact objection dates.

    City building/planning records · Weight: hard

Export draft

Plaintiff’s family residence and ADU project site at 1816 S McClelland St, Salt Lake City, UT, is immediately adjacent to David N. Wolf, Division Director of Constitutional Defense & Special Litigation in the Utah Attorney General’s Office. Mr. Wolf’s spouse holds a senior role in the DHHS / Child Protection Services orbit. Plaintiff’s ADU permit process was opposed through city channels. These are public titles and geographic facts. They establish a structural conflict of interest when AG-office review and CPS process touch Plaintiff’s family case.

Attach

  • Property map / KML / assessor records (adjacency)
  • AG org chart / public bio for David N. Wolf
  • DHHS public listing for Carrie Martinez-Wolf
  • ADU permit file + neighbor objections with dates

Never say

  • That Wolf “orchestrated” the divorce
  • Unprovable surveillance or “honeypot” language
  • Bloodline or intelligence-network claims

Rebuttal: Titles and addresses are public. Proximity is geographic fact. No motive language required; structural COI is enough for the Court’s attention.

P3

CPS Process · AG-Office Direction on Record

STRONG · needs-docs

Recorded CPS call acknowledges AG-office review/direction of findings; child-injury CPS files closed rapidly despite documented injuries.

Fact spine

  • 2025-03 · CPS (Boyd Madsen context)

    Call recording: AG Office reviewed and directed continuation of “non-severe neglect” findings despite earlier plan to drop findings for lack of evidence.

    Audio recording + transcript · Weight: hard

  • various · CPS

    Documented child injuries (dog-bite stitches; cheek-pinch black eye; bruises); CPS actions dropped within short windows — keep exact close dates.

    CPS notices + medical/photo exhibits · Weight: hard

Export draft

Plaintiff preserved a recorded conversation with CPS in which the worker acknowledged Attorney General’s Office review and direction regarding findings of “non-severe neglect,” including continuation of findings the worker had previously indicated lacked evidence. Separately, documented child injuries (including facial lacerations requiring stitches and a black eye from a pinch) were the subject of CPS activity that closed on an accelerated timeline. Plaintiff seeks the Court’s attention to the process integrity of those investigations given the documented adjacency of AG and DHHS personnel to Plaintiff’s residence.

Attach

  • Audio file + full transcript of CPS call
  • CPS case numbers and close letters
  • Injury photos with timestamps
  • Medical / stitch records

Never say

  • That CPS is “eating kids” or ritual language
  • Speculation about uncharged crimes without evidence

Rebuttal: Process integrity + public adjacency facts; child-safety language only.

P4

Fee Judgment ~$36k Against Indigent Primary Caretaker

STRONG · needs-docs

GAL + opposing attorney fees entered against unemployed/uninsured primary caretaker while opposing party had higher income.

Fact spine

  • 2026-03-17 · Court (Judge Heather Brereton context)

    Entered fee / support judgments totaling ~$36,712 (attorney fees ~$28,027.50 + child support/GAL ~$8,684.50 + interest).

    Judgment order · Weight: hard

  • 2026-05-15 · Plaintiff

    Motion to Set Aside under URCP 60(b) citing excusable neglect and residual grounds: PTSD, heart issues, executive dysfunction, unaddressed ADA, courtroom breakdown.

    Filed motion · Weight: hard

  • 2026-06-03 · Plaintiff

    Emergency packet: Rule 60(b)(3), temporary custody/parent-time, TRO blocking sale/encumbrance of 1816, TRO preventing removal of children from Utah, Motion to Remove GAL.

    Court filing · Weight: hard

Export draft

On or about March 17, 2026, the Court entered judgments totaling approximately $36,712 against Plaintiff (including substantial GAL and opposing-attorney fee components). At relevant times Plaintiff was indigent, uninsured, and the children’s primary caretaker pre-separation, while the opposing party earned significantly more. Plaintiff’s ability to defend was impaired by unaccommodated disabilities (see ADA claim). Plaintiff has sought relief under URCP 60(b) and continues to request fee reallocation consistent with ability to pay and primary-caretaker history.

Attach

  • Judgment order(s)
  • Income evidence both sides
  • 60(b) motion + exhibits
  • Indigency affidavit / IFP if used

Never say

  • That fees prove a conspiracy
  • Inflammatory attacks on GAL as a person

Rebuttal: Ability to pay + primary-caretaker history + unaccommodated disability.

P5

Child Safety + Protective-Order Vacate Posture

SUPPORT · needs-docs

Documented injuries + changed circumstances; PO entry rested heavily on alleged temporary-order violation during belongings retrieval with police present.

Fact spine

  • various · Children / medical

    Injuries documented: dog bite requiring stitches; cheek pinch causing black eye; multiple bruises. Photos and medical records.

    Photos / medical · Weight: hard

  • 2025-01-02 · Plaintiff

    Police-escorted belongings retrieval after locks changed; brief contact with grandmother about kids’ iPads from car; arrested. Temporary-order violation theory used to sustain PO.

    Police reports / call logs / PO hearing notes · Weight: hard

  • ongoing · Plaintiff

    Seeks vacate/dismiss of protective order: changed circumstances; harm to children’s relationship with father; child-focused language only.

    Utah Respondent’s Request to Vacate / Dismiss forms · Weight: testimony

Export draft

Plaintiff seeks modification or vacatur of the protective order based on changed circumstances and the best interests of the children. The order’s practical effect has been to severely restrict a previously primary-caretaker parent’s relationship with his children. Plaintiff attaches contemporaneous police reports, call logs, and text evidence of co-parenting history, and documented child-safety concerns raised in good faith. Plaintiff does not seek to relitigate unproven character attacks; Plaintiff asks the Court to restore a parent-child relationship consistent with Utah law and the children’s needs.

Attach

  • PO order + temporary order
  • Police reports 2 Jan 2025
  • Call logs / texts (co-parenting history)
  • Child injury photo index
  • Utah vacate/dismiss form

Never say

  • Weaponize kids as leverage language
  • Accuse third parties of abuse without evidence already in file
  • Mystical or ritual framing of any adult

Rebuttal: Changed circumstances + best interests + primary-caretaker history.

P6

Workplace / Social Graph · YogaSix + Myhre/Guice Public Titles

SUPPORT · needs-docs

YogaSix owner Joe Guice publicly married to Kathleen Myhre; Myhre publicly listed as Utah AG Criminal Analyst (SECURE/Investigations) with USAF background; Petitioner’s YogaSix employment still needs hard employment exhibit.

Fact spine

  • ongoing · Joe Guice (public profile)

    Identifies as YogaSix studio owner in the Salt Lake City area; Facebook personal details list married to Kathleen Myhre since April 5, 2026; friends with Kathleen Myhre.

    Public Facebook profile text · Weight: hard (public self-statement)

  • ongoing · Kathleen Myhre (public listings)

    Listed as Criminal Analyst / Criminal Information Specialist, SECURE, Investigations Division, Utah Attorney General’s Office; South Jordan/SLC orbit; public USAF service materials and uniform photo with MYHRE name tape (kathi.myhre posts).

    LinkedIn / ZoomInfo / Utah AG salary listings + public Instagram · Weight: hard (public titles)

  • 2024-08+ · Petitioner / YogaSix timeline

    Archive notes Petitioner employment/social orbit at Yoga Six Sugar House — still requires paystub, schedule, work email, or staff listing as hard exhibit.

    User timeline + pending employment docs · Weight: partial until docs attached

Export draft

Public records and social profiles show that Joe Guice identifies as a YogaSix studio owner in the Salt Lake City area and is married to Kathleen Myhre. Public professional listings identify Kathleen Myhre as a Criminal Analyst / Criminal Information Specialist in the SECURE / Investigations Division of the Utah Attorney General’s Office, with prior United States Air Force service reflected in public materials. If Petitioner’s employment at YogaSix is documented by employment records, workplace orbit sits adjacent to public AG-office personnel. These are public titles and social-graph facts offered for process-integrity context, not as proof of case orchestration.

Attach

  • Screenshots of Joe Guice Facebook bio + married-to Myhre line
  • Public AG employment listing / LinkedIn print for Kathleen Myhre
  • kathi.myhre USAF uniform post (name tape visible)
  • Petitioner YogaSix employment proof (paystub / email / schedule) — NEED
  • Any contemporaneous email already in case file tying workplace to timeline

Never say

  • Brainwashing, patterning, or CIA/art-laser theories
  • That Myhre or Guice “ran” or “orchestrated” the custody case without a hard document showing case action
  • Secret-program or trafficking-network language without adjudicated findings

Rebuttal: Public titles and marriage/workplace graph are observable. Structural adjacency to AG Investigations is a process-integrity fact pattern; motive is not required and should not be alleged without documents.

Motion playbook

1

Respondent’s Request to Vacate / Dismiss Protective Order

Utah court form — changed circumstances + child relationship harm

When: Immediate priority when safety rationale no longer holds

Why: Narrowest, child-focused path. Attach only what is already in the file.

Respondent moves to vacate/dismiss the protective order based on changed circumstances and the best interests of the minor children.

2

ADA accommodation motion for all future hearings

Title II interactive process · remote appearance + breaks + written agenda

When: Before any next hearing

Why: Creates a paper trail the court must either grant or deny on the record.

Plaintiff requests reasonable accommodations under the ADA / Utah equivalents for all remaining proceedings in this matter.

3

URCP 60(b) relief from fee / parentage orders

60(b)(1) excusable neglect · 60(b)(6) residual · cite ADA impairment

When: While judgments remain unpaid / appeal window strategy

Why: Connects unaccommodated disability + indigency to ability to defend.

Plaintiff moves under URCP 60(b) for relief from the March 2026 judgments based on excusable neglect and extraordinary circumstances including unaccommodated disability.

4

Emergency relief — children remaining in Utah / property TRO

TRO / preliminary injunction style packet already modeled 3 Jun 2026

When: If removal from Utah or sale of 1816 is imminent

Why: Preserves status quo and children’s stability.

Plaintiff seeks emergency relief preventing removal of the minor children from Utah and preventing sale or encumbrance of the family residence at 1816 S McClelland St without further order of the Court.

5

Motion to replace / remove GAL

As modeled in June 3 packet

When: Bias or cost issues documented

Why: Fee burden + process integrity

Plaintiff moves for replacement or removal of the Guardian ad Litem based on fee burden and process-integrity concerns already of record.

6

Appellate posture (20250632-CA)

Preserve ADA, fees, process issues after final appealable orders

When: After final appealable orders

Why: Protects record for higher court review

Preserve issues of ADA accommodation, fee allocation, and process integrity for appellate review.

Exhibit index

IDLabelStatus
EX-001Written ADA request (Jan 2026)need
EX-002Hearing video · 9 Jan 2026 (breakdown segment)partial
EX-003Court minutes · 9 Jan 2026 (only “break”)need
EX-004Medical/therapy letters (PTSD, anxiety, agoraphobia, executive dysfunction)partial
EX-005Property map / KML / assessor · 1816 adjacency to Wolf residencepartial
EX-006AG public bio / org chart · David N. Wolfneed
EX-007DHHS public listing · Carrie Martinez-Wolfneed
EX-008ADU permit file + neighbor objection datesneed
EX-009CPS call audio + full transcript (~Mar 2025)partial
EX-010CPS case numbers and close lettersneed
EX-011Child injury photos (timestamped)partial
EX-012Medical/stitch records for childrenpartial
EX-013Judgment order(s) ~17 Mar 2026 (~$36,712)need
EX-014Income evidence both sidesneed
EX-015URCP 60(b) motion + exhibits (15 May 2026)partial
EX-016Indigency affidavit / IFP if usedneed
EX-017Protective order + temporary orderneed
EX-018Police reports · 2 Jan 2025need
EX-019Call logs/texts · co-parenting historypartial
EX-020Utah Vacate/Dismiss form (draft)need
EX-021Emergency packet · 3 Jun 2026partial
EX-022GAL fee statements / assignment historyneed
EX-023Joe Guice public profile · YogaSix owner + married to Myhrehave
EX-024Kathleen Myhre public AG title listings (SECURE / Investigations)have
EX-025kathi.myhre USAF uniform post (name tape)have
EX-026Petitioner YogaSix employment proof (paystub/email/schedule)need
EX-027iMessage forensics — Dec24 export, 2022–2024, 585–819+ pages (volume only; no chat text here)partial
EX-028Oliver castle drawing + professional psych analysis (defensive structures / divorce trauma) as already enteredpartial
EX-0292024 spitting transcript (ex conversation) cited in May 2026 packetneed
EX-030Sworn non-violence statementneed

Chronology

  • ~2016Death of longtime friend Tregen / Tregan Kim Lewis — cited as cumulative trauma factor in 60(b) grounds (not a case party)
  • ~2017Prior marriage to Ardis / Ardyce / Artis Taylor ended (family-history note only)
  • 2024-06+ADU conflict escalates at 1816 S McClelland
  • 2024-08+Studio employment (Yoga Six Sugar House) begins — timeline only
  • 2025-01-02Police-escorted belongings retrieval · arrest · temporary-order theory
  • ~2025-03CPS call / AG-office direction context
  • ~2025-03Protective order hearing; multi-year order entry
  • 2026-01-09ADA hearing · remote request not ruled · breakdown · minutes “break”
  • 2026-03-17Fee/support judgments ~$36,712
  • 2026-04-05Joe Guice public Facebook: married Kathleen Myhre
  • 2026-05-15URCP 60(b) motion filed
  • 2026-06-03Emergency filing packet
  • 2026-05-08Oliver turned 8 (documented birthday in Exhibit A draft)
  • 2026-05Willa referenced ~3 years old; primary-caretaker history >1 year restated
  • 2026-05Emergency motions cluster: iMessage volume + castle drawing + injury photos + out-of-state removal
  • 2026-07-14Exhibit A draft compiled (parties, judgments, ADA, addresses) — draft, not a filed stamp
  • 2026-08-04Tribune membership note (archive)
  • 2026-08-05P6 wall locked: Myhre AG/USAF public titles + Guice YogaSix marriage graph

Affidavit shell (numbered)

  1. I am Timothy Andrew Lewis, Plaintiff/Respondent in Civil No. 244906225 and related matters in the Third Judicial District Court, Salt Lake County.
  2. I was the children’s primary caretaker for more than six years prior to separation. At relevant times I have been indigent and uninsured.
  3. My residence and the ADU project site is 1816 S McClelland St, Salt Lake City, UT 84105, immediately adjacent to the residence of David N. Wolf, Division Director of Constitutional Defense & Special Litigation, Utah Attorney General’s Office. Mr. Wolf’s spouse holds a senior DHHS role with CPS oversight proximity.
  4. On or about January 9, 2026, I formally requested a reasonable ADA accommodation of remote appearance based on documented PTSD, severe anxiety, agoraphobia, and executive dysfunction. The Court did not rule on the request. I experienced a visible anxiety crisis during the hearing. Court minutes record only an unexplained “break.”
  5. After the January 9, 2026 hearing I was housebound for an extended period. My ability to participate in subsequent proceedings remained impaired by unaccommodated disability.
  6. I preserved a recorded conversation with CPS in which the worker acknowledged Attorney General’s Office review and direction regarding “non-severe neglect” findings.
  7. Documented child injuries include a dog bite requiring facial stitches, a cheek pinch causing a black eye, and multiple bruises. Related CPS activity closed on an accelerated timeline. Photos and medical records exist.
  8. On January 2, 2025, after locks were changed, I arrived for a police-escorted belongings retrieval. I briefly spoke from the car to the children’s grandmother about iPads. I was arrested. The protective order’s practical basis included the alleged temporary-order violation.
  9. On or about March 17, 2026, judgments totaling approximately $36,712 (including substantial GAL and opposing-attorney fee components) were entered against me despite indigency and primary-caretaker history.
  10. On May 15, 2026, I moved under URCP 60(b) for relief, citing excusable neglect and residual grounds including unaccommodated disability and the January 9 breakdown.
  11. On June 3, 2026, I filed an emergency packet seeking, among other relief, protection against removal of the children from Utah and against sale or encumbrance of 1816 S McClelland St without further order.
  12. Public professional listings identify Kathleen Myhre as a Criminal Analyst / Criminal Information Specialist in the SECURE / Investigations Division of the Utah Attorney General’s Office. Public social profiles show Joe Guice as a YogaSix studio owner married to Kathleen Myhre. These are public titles and social-graph facts offered only for process-integrity context.
  13. I preserved iMessage export analysis covering 2022–2024 (commonly referenced as the December 2024 export), documented in the archive as 585 to 819+ pages. The messages themselves are not reproduced here; the original export belongs in the evidence binder.
  14. Oliver’s castle drawing and a professional psychological analysis describing defensive structures, emotional conflict, and divorce trauma were submitted as psych evidence in the May 2026 cluster. Injury photographs (facial lacerations with stitches, ear wounds, chest wounds) and a 2024 spitting transcript were referenced in the same emergency packet seeking to prevent out-of-state removal.
  15. I seek vacatur or modification of the protective order based on changed circumstances and the best interests of the children, not to relitigate unproven character attacks.
  16. All statements above are based on personal knowledge, contemporaneous records, or documents already in the court file or available for attachment. I do not offer speculative theories of motive or institutional conspiracy.

Cross-wall links

  • · ADA → Fees: unaccommodated disability impaired ability to defend.
  • · Wolf COI → CPS/AG: Same AG/DHHS orbit that sits next door reviewed CPS findings.
  • · Myhre/Guice P6 → Wolf P2: separate public AG titles adjacent to family/workplace orbit.
  • · Injuries → PO vacate: documented safety concerns + changed circumstances.
  • · Fees → GAL motion: fee burden against indigent parent.
  • · Emergency → all walls: June 3 packet preserves status quo while walls are perfected.

Not legal advice. Review with licensed counsel before filing. Cold weights only.